Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼Ò¾ÆȯÀÚ ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ý¿¡¼­ chloral hydrateÀÇ ¿ë·®¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁøÁ¤È¿°ú¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A COMPARISON OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT ON CHLORAL HYDRATE DOSAGE IN THE SEDATION OF THE PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 32±Ç 3È£ p.517 ~ 524
³ë½Âö, ±è¿µÀç, Àå±âÅÃ, ÇѼ¼Çö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³ë½Âö ( Rho Seung-Chul ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿µÀç ( Kim Young-Jae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
Àå±âÅà( Jang Ki-Taeg ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÇѼ¼Çö ( Hahn Se-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Chloral hydrate´Â ¼Ò¾ÆȯÀÚ ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ý ½Ã hydroxyzine°ú ÇÔ²² °¡Àå ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¾à¹°ÀÓ¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ÇùÁ¶µµ°¡ ºÒ·®ÇÑ ¾î¸° ȯ¾ÆµéÀÇ ÇൿÁ¶ÀýÀ» À§ÇÑ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¿ë·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇ°ßÀÌ ºÐºÐÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤À̸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ chloral hydrate¸¦ Á¦Á¶»çÀÇ Ãßõ¿ë·®À¸·Î »ç¿ë ½Ã ÀûÀýÇÑ ÁøÁ¤¼öÁØÀ» Á¦°øÇϴµ¥ ÀÖ¾î ÀæÀº ½ÇÆи¦ ÃÊ·¡ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Áö±Ý±îÁöµµ. chloral hydrate¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÔ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¾à¹°ÀÇ ¿ë·®¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁøÁ¤ÀÇ È¿°ú¿Í ¾ÈÀü¼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ¸¹Àº ÀÇ°ßµéÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù.

º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼Ò¾ÆȯÀÚ ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ý¿¡¼­ chloral hydrateÀÇ ¿ë·®¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁøÁ¤ÀÇ È¿°ú¿Í ¾ÈÀü¼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¿ë·®À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°íÀÚ, ¼Ò¾ÆȯÀÚ ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ý ½Ã Á¦Á¶»çÀÇ Ãßõ¿ë·®ÀÎ chloral hydrate 50mg/kg¿Í ´õ ³ôÀº ¿ë·®ÀÎ 70mg/kgÀ» hydroxyzine 2mg/kg¿Í 50% N©üO¿Í ÇÔ²² Åõ¿©ÇÏ°í, ÁøÁ¤ÀÇ È¿°ú¿Í ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ºñ±³, Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.

1. ¼ö¸é, ¿ïÀ½, ¿òÁ÷ÀÓ, ÀüüÀûÀÎ Çൿ¾ç»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µÎ ±º °£ÀÇ ºñ±³, Æò°¡¿¡¼­ ¥±±º(70mg/kg)ÀÌ ¥°±º(50mg/kg)¿¡ ºñÇØ ³× °¡Áö Ç׸ñ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ´õ ³ôÀº Æò±Õ°ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù(p£¼0.05).

2. ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ýÀÇ ¼º°ø·ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µÎ ±º °£ÀÇ Æò°¡¿¡¼­ ¥°±ºÀº 38.7%, ¥±±ºÀº 71.0%ÀÇ ¼º°ø·üÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù(p£¼0.05).

3. Àú»ê¼ÒÁõÀÇ ¹ß»ý·ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µÎ ±º °£ÀÇ Æò°¡¿¡¼­ ¥°±ºÀº 22.6%, ¥±±ºÀº 19.4%ÀÇ ¹ß»ý·üÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p£¾0.05).

Despite the widespread use of chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine in the sedation of children, there is little agreement among pediatric dentists regarding its therapeutic dosage for the management of very uncooperative young children. Also, increasing concern has been raised with respect to its frequent failure to provide adequate levels of sedation when used according to the manufacturer¡¯s recommended dosage.

Therefore, there has been many suggestions with respect to sedative effectiveness and safety of varying drug dosage, and some pediatric dental articles have advocated dosages exceeding manufacturer¡¯s recommendations.

This study was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety in behavior management of the manufacturer¡¯s recommended dose of chloral hydrate(50mg/kg) with those of a higher dose(70mg/kg) used together with hydroxyzine(2mg/kg) and nitrous oxide(50%) when young children were sedated for dental treatment.

The following results were obtained;

1. ¥± group(70mg/kg) displayed higher mean score compared to ¥° group(50mg/kg) with regard to the degree of sleep, crying, movement and overall behavior. The difference was statistically significant(p£¼0.05).

2. In comparison of success rates for sedation between the two groups, ¥° group and ¥± group showed 38.7% and 71.0% success rates respectively. An analysis of variance was statistically significant(p£¼0.05).

3. Comparing the occurrence rate hypoxia between the two groups, there were 22.6% and 19.4% occurrence of hypoxia in ¥° group and ¥± group. An analysis of variance was not statistically significant(p£¾0.05).

Å°¿öµå

ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ý;¾à¹°ÀÇ ¿ë·®;Çൿ¾ç»ó;Àú»ê¼ÒÁõ
Chloral hydrate;Sedation;Drug dosage;Overall behavior;Hypoxia

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI